-
Short answer: yes, if you buy what Lexmark actually makes well
-
Why my opinion is worth five minutes of your time
-
The Lexmark X4650: the printer everyone keeps Googling
- What Lexmark genuinely does well
-
The honest downsides
-
Wait — are you actually shopping for a different kind of printer?
-
When Lexmark is the wrong call
Short answer: yes, if you buy what Lexmark actually makes well
Lexmark is a solid choice for business laser printing — not because of the marketing, but because the hardware works consistently under real office conditions. That's the conclusion after four years of inspecting printers and print output as a quality compliance manager for an office equipment distributor. I review 200+ print-related deliverables a year, and I've seen what survives in the field and what doesn't.
If you're here because you searched "is Lexmark a good printer," here's the short version: for business laser and multifunction units, yes — seriously worth considering. For used inkjets like the X4650 in 2025, that's a different conversation, and I'll be honest about it below.
Why my opinion is worth five minutes of your time
I don't work for Lexmark. I work for a distributor that carries Lexmark, HP, Brother, and other brands. My job is to set acceptance criteria, audit output quality, and reject hardware that doesn't meet spec. In Q1 2024, I ran a 40,000-page mixed-fleet audit measuring jams, color drift, and skew. That data shapes what I think about these machines.
Everything I'd read suggested Lexmark was a niche player with a loyal but small following. Conventional wisdom said you couldn't go wrong with the bigger consumer names. In practice, our arrival-failure rate on Lexmark laser units was measurably lower than the incumbent brand we'd used for years. I want to say 1.7% versus 3.2%, but don't quote me on those exact numbers — it's been a couple of years. What I remember clearly is that Lexmark earned a permanent spot on our approved vendor list after that year.
Honestly? I started with plenty of skepticism. The data overrode it.
One more story that shaped my view. Last spring, we had 48 hours to finalize specs for a 300-seat deployment when our primary vendor couldn't deliver. Normally I'd run a two-week benchmark. There was no time. We went with a Lexmark fleet based on prior audit data alone. In hindsight, I should have pushed back on the timeline. But with procurement deadlines and an impatient CFO, I made the call with incomplete information. Three months later, the fleet was performing above our baseline. Sometimes a data-informed guess beats a perfect process.
The Lexmark X4650: the printer everyone keeps Googling
The X4650 gets a lot of search traffic, which makes sense. It was a popular all-in-one inkjet back in its day — print, copy, scan, fax, and wireless that felt cutting-edge in 2007. It was aimed at small offices, and for that era, it was genuinely decent.
Actually, let me rephrase. It was decent for its time. I've seen X4650s still running in dental offices and small law firms well into the 2020s. The hardware held up. But "still running" and "worth buying used today" are very different statements. Driver support on modern Windows is spotty. Cartridges are getting harder to find. The printer itself might be fine — the ecosystem around it has aged.
If you already own an X4650: keep using it while supplies last. If you're thinking about buying one secondhand, here's a quick checklist:
- Confirm cartridge availability and street price before you commit.
- Check driver compatibility with your actual operating system.
- Understand that you're buying a machine from 2007, not a modern device.
I'd steer you toward a current entry-level laser multifunction instead. Per-page costs will be lower, and you get supported drivers.
For small offices still using older multifunction printers for mailings, one practical reference: USPS Business Mail 101 (pe.usps.com/businessmail101) defines a standard letter as up to 6.125 × 11.5 inches. Every Lexmark multifunction I've certified handles that envelope spec without issue — but it's worth verifying on any used machine before you buy.
What Lexmark genuinely does well
Output consistency
In that Q1 2024 audit, we tested color drift across 30 consecutive prints using Pantone-referenced brand colors. Industry tolerance for brand-critical colors is Delta E below 2. Lexmark's color laser units stayed within that range across all 30 prints. A comparable unit from another brand drifted on the fourth print. I won't name that brand publicly — it's not my job to dunk on competitors — but the gap showed up in the data.
Security
If you've ever had to manage printer fleet security, you know most vendors treat it as a checkbox. Lexmark has been quietly strong here. We specified secure print release on a 50,000-unit annual contract in 2023, and Lexmark's implementation was the least painful of the three brands we benchmarked. For enterprise buyers, that matters more than a spec sheet speed number.
Paper handling
Jams happen. Anyone promising otherwise is lying. But Lexmark's paper path design — especially on workgroup lasers — handles standard office paper better than most. In our 40,000-page audit, Lexmark had the lowest paper-induced jam rate. That's a real-world reliability signal you won't see on a marketing page.
The honest downsides
Transparency is the point of this article, so here's the other side. Lexmark's inkjet history — including the X4650 — is not their strength. They're a laser-first company. Their inkjets were frequently rebadged or region-specific, and driver support was inconsistent. If you're buying a Lexmark inkjet today, you're on the wrong side of their curve.
Second, consumables are where Lexmark makes money. List prices on cartridges look steep. But here's the thing: high-yield toner on their laser units is actually cost-competitive on a per-page basis. The box price is not the street price. Compare per-page costs, not hardware prices. I've learned to ask "what's NOT included" before "what's the price" — and printing is no exception.
Third, be careful with third-party cartridges. We tested a batch once that looked fine and produced streaked output after about 20 pages. The black toner was off-spec. That cost us a reprint and an awkward client meeting. And a note on environmental claims: per FTC Green Guides (ftc.gov), a product marked "recyclable" should be recyclable in areas where at least 60% of consumers have access. I've seen cartridge recycling claims that don't survive that test. OEM or certified cartridges are worth the premium for mission-critical work.
Wait — are you actually shopping for a different kind of printer?
Here's something our analytics shows all the time: people land on office printer reviews while actually looking for something else. If "best 3D printer for beginners 2025" or "Toybox 3D printer" is what you originally searched, stop reading this review — it's not the article you need. Entry-level 3D printers are a completely different category. They don't print paper. They print plastic filament. The word "printer" is the only thing they share with office equipment.
Similarly, "acrylic paint" shows up in our printer search analytics. That's an art supply, not a printing consumable. If that's what you're after, an art store is your answer, not an office supply vendor.
Different problems, different tools. A Lexmark laser won't help you print miniatures, and a Toybox won't help your office mail merge.
When Lexmark is the wrong call
- You print under 100 pages a month. A workgroup laser is overkill. A basic consumer printer would do — just check per-page ink cost first.
- You need wide-format or photo-realistic output. Laser color gamut is inherently narrower than liquid ink. For gallery-quality prints, you want a photo inkjet.
- The model is discontinued. If the seller can't confirm cartridge availability and driver compatibility, walk away. That's the X4650 situation in 2025.
- You need a 3D printer. Set a budget and look at proper 3D printing resources. Toybox-style beginner units run roughly $250–500 — and that decision is unrelated to any office printer purchase.
Here's the thing people get wrong about printer buying: they shop by brand instead of by use case. I've rejected shipments from brands I like and certified machines from brands I was skeptical about. The best printer is the one that still runs and still has affordable supplies three years from now. If a Lexmark laser fits that test in your situation, buy it with confidence. If you're buying a used 2007 inkjet or expecting an office printer to do 3D printing work — no, just no.
Discuss this procurement topic
Use the contact form if you need a sourcing review connected to this article. For public comments, keep details general and avoid sharing confidential device or invoice data.
Contact the Review Desk